Diversity Assignment Washburn Diversity - 902 Words

Diversity Assignment Washburn values diversity as it serves to make the world more interesting and creates a well-rounded learning environment that promotes intellectual curiosity. I feel that the most important aspect of the Washburn diversity statement is creating that well-rounded learning atmosphere. It encourages students to form their own opinions about the world and not simply listen to what anyone tells them. In regards to the Washburn diversity statement, I would say that I definitely support it as it seeks to create well-rounded individuals with the free will to see the world in whatever way they see fit. The name of the individual I met with was Brandon Habig, a student in another section of WU 101 who was an acquaintance from high school. While we did go to the same high school, our differences include the fact that he was a relatively hard worker, receiving a 4.0 grade point average at the end of high school whereas I put minimal effort into high school only receiving a 3.2 by the end. Additionally, we grew up in very different households with his parents forcing him to get a job where mine were largely unbothered by my lack of employment. There was a reason that I chose to interview him over the countless other acquaintances I have made over my short time in college, I wanted to have a serious discussion. I felt that it was necessary to meet with someone I was relatively familiar with so that I could ask serious questions without coming off as jaded orShow MoreRelatedThe Value Of Diversity At Washburn University1254 Words   |  6 Pages Washburn University has always been proud of having diversity since it first opened its doors to the public 151 years ago. If you are to look around campus many are able to see how much diversity is valued by the campus as a whole, they know everyone is different and each person has their own story to tell. If a university made it where no one is allowed to talk about where they came before and how they ended up where they are in life. what is the point of being proud of who you are? For me, itRead MoreSadie Hawkins Day and Valentine Grams18321 Words   |  74 Pagespercussion performs well; very Overture to Nabucco by Verdi, and High returning from previous years. sensitive. However, the effect of the ended the concert with New England However, Evergreen Valley High performance would be a lot stronger if Holiday by Washburn. It seemed that School replaced Yerba Buena High the violinists’ bowings were in sync,† the Symphonic Orchestra hit some difficulties in certain portions of their School as the third school in this said Dr. Felder in his recordings. The Legend was

Animal Testing Is Unethical - 1089 Words

Shaelyn Mounts Professor Martinez English 101 4 December 2017 Animal Testing Animal testing is a practice which scientists have been using for hundreds of years. It uses non-human animals to test how substances may affect their behavior or health. Whether or not it should be allowed has been a debated for years. Some believe animal testing to be unethical. Others believe it to be a necessary evil that has advanced our scientific knowledge. There are also those who believe that animals hold the same rights as humans, and of course there are those who disagree. I hold the opinion that animal testing should be banned. The torturous pain and suffering of the animals involved is unethical, unnecessary, and unreliable. Animal experimentation is†¦show more content†¦But because it’s mice, rabbits, etc. the public seems to pay no mind to the ethics behind animal experimentation. Because there are so many alternatives to animal testing it is completely unethical to continue it. Animal testing is unnecessary. Some may say that animals are our only option to determine whether a product is safe for use. However, that is simply not the case. â€Å"Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses† (Animal 1). Experiments out of curiosity should be conducted using alternatives such as computer simulation or in vitro testing. Both represent how a substance will react with a human. They have both provided accurate results. Computer simulation uses data sets to model the potential side effects of a drug. In vitro testing uses human cell models to predict how toxic a drug may be. The United States military and many universities have used both of these methods. There is no reason to use a live animal for such experiment. There is also no reason to use animals for what we do today. For exa mple, beauty products. A lot of makeup products share the same formulas yet are still tested on animals. The reason for this is because companies want to be able to increase profits and sell in Chinese markets. Animal testing is mandated byShow MoreRelatedAnimal Testing Is Unethical?1061 Words   |  5 PagesCOMM101-110 Speech Title: Why Animal Testing Is Unethical General Purpose: To expose my audience to animal testing. Specific Purpose: To make people aware of how animal testing is cruel and outdated. Organizational Pattern: INTRODUCTION: (1) Attention Getting Device: Years ago animal testing was started to help humans obtain information. Now almost every product on the market has been tested on an animal during some stage of its production. Through these test thousands of animals die painful deaths everyRead MoreEssay about Animal Testing is Unethical1385 Words   |  6 Pageswill be. You cant even decide when the lights go on and off. Think about spending your entire life like this, even though you didnt do anything wrong or commit a crime. This is life in a laboratory for animals. It is deprivation, isolation, and misery. Now think about the needs of the animals that are caged up and stripped away from their natural homes. For example, chimpanzees spend hours everyday grooming each other feeding their young and providing a comfortable environment for them to liveRead MoreEnding Animal Cruelty647 Words   |  3 PagesAnimal testing is used internationally to understand and create medicines and to test the safety of products. Almost 20 million animals are experimented on and killed annually worldwide, an estimated eight million of which are subjects in experiments involving pain while at least 10 percent of these animals do not receive painkillers (Andre Velasquez, 1988). Clearly these experimentations are reducing the quality of life for these animals, and as such there has been growing criticism of animalRead MoreAnimal Testing Should Not Be Banned1673 Words   |  7 Pages8322020 Animal Slavery Imagine you being tested on what do you think that feels like ? The total amount of animals used for testing on agriculture experiments is 1.13 million. This is only in the agriculture industry. Now imagine all the other industries that allow animal testing.They’re rights are being violated and there is nothing they can do about it but just take the pain that they don’t deserve. All of this could be stopped but to stop it has to begin somewhere. Animal testing does nothingRead MoreAnimal Experimentation Should Be Abolished1211 Words   |  5 PagesAnimal experimentation is used across the world to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. The history of animal experimentation dates back to the ancient times when scientists made use of animals principally to satisfy anatomical curiosity. They would examine sensory and motors nerves to gain a deeper understanding of their functions. The testing of these animals is not a widespread topic that we ar e talking about in today’s society. We seem to have just accepted the factRead MoreSave Animals. Say No to Animal Testing!1390 Words   |  6 PagesArgumentative essay: Save animals. Say no to animal testing! Nowadays, it is a well-known fact that many companies test their products like cosmetics and medicines with animals before production to check their products ’safety and quality. A huge amount of animals are used in research purpose every year. Is it right for human beings to sacrifice millions of animals for testing purpose? Should animal testing be banned? Animal testing is a controversial issue and there is a heated debated about prosRead MoreAnimal Experimentation Should Not Be Banned857 Words   |  4 Pagesmeaning about animal experimentation. Animal experimentation is the use of animals, mostly monkeys, on research. Reason being as to why monkeys is because monkeys are far more intelligent than other animals. Animals are stripped from the environment and are tested on so scientists can make products safe for humans. The big problem is that it is inhumane. Animal experimentation should and needs to be stopped because it is cruel, unethical, and not reliable. Having scientists test on animals is cruelRead MoreAnimal Testing And Biological Experiments1308 Words   |  6 PagesAnimals, humans, alike are thinking breathing and emotional creatures that habit this beautiful Earth. Every year over 100 million animals die from animal testing and biological experiments (Peta.) Animals may not be able to reason or talk, but they can suffer. They feel pain and fear similarly to the way humans do, in fact their reactions to pain are almost identical. Therefore should not be taken advantage of or used as test dummies. The consequence of testing on animals for the greater good doesRead MoreArgumentative Essay On Animal Testing1485 Words   |  6 Pagesinhale toxic gases. This is just a couple examples of the pain and suffering animals go through while being experimented on. Experimentation can be defined as a process that performs a scientific procedure that usually takes place in the lab to dictate something. Animal experimentation is unethical because of the many terrible tests conducted, it’s cruel, animals are equivalent to humans, and it’s not necessary. Animal testing has been around for a long time. Going all the way back to 384 - 322 BCRead MoreAnimal Testing : Is It Right?912 Words   |  4 PagesAnimal Testing: is it Right? Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or animal research, is the use of non-human animals in experiments. While most people think animal testing is necessary, others are upset by what they see as needless suffering. Experimentation on animals help scientists increase knowledge about the way the human body works. Animal research can also expand the knowledge of biological, medical, psychological studies, and has led to vaccines against smallpox, measles

Ethics and Social Issues for Kantianism Theory- myassignmenthelp

Question: Write about theEthics and Social Issues for Kantianism Theory. Answer: Introduction Automation and accuracy of vehicles has developed at a very rapid rate in the past millennium. It has mirrored many improvements in the knowledge of automobiles, especially in the sectors of cars regarding sensing and processing. Media coverage has mostly focused on the calculated safety merits from the automation and accuracy of the cars which has led to innovation and manufacturing of self-driving cars. The application of computer technology in the cars is anticipated to be more precise, predictable and attentive than the human drivers (Corey, et al., 2014). The ethical issues that are arising due to the operation of self-driving cars are mentioned very less. It is a fact that road vehicle travelling at any speed definitely involves risk to a certain degree, even in the case of the self-driving cars which are controlled by computer with hardware that is free of failure and perfect sensing abilities. Thesis Statement To find out the importance of accuracy and automation in self-driving cars with Kantianism theory Ethical Issues A completely automated self-driving car needs to constantly decide the ways in which the allocation of risk with the oversight of any human driver would be done. Use of the self-driving cars would have several ethical issues in regards to making complex decisions which further denotes to the safety concerns regarding use of automated vehicles (Fowler, 2016). The first issue is regarding liability as it is presently not clear that who would be accountable to be at fault in the case where crash of a vehicle occurs due to self-driving. The second issue is regarding the capability of self-driving cars for making complex decisions involving ethics while driving, mostly prior to crash. Driving at any reasonable speed can never be predicted to be completely safe. Afully trailer of loaded tractor travelling at 100 km/ hour needs calculative 8 seconds to arrive to a complete stop while a passenger vehicle like a car would require approximately three seconds (Gibson, 2016). Complete safe travel needs very accurate calculations and prediction of other behavior of vehicle of over the particular frame of time which is something that is not possible provided the close proximities of the vehicles. In order to ensure the safety of all, the self-driving cars must be capable of assessing risks continuously which includes the risk of driving on a curve at a certain speed, risks of side-swiping a vehicle travelling adjacently for avoiding the closing in on a runaway truck, and crossing of the centerline for passing a cyclist. The programmer in the self-driven cars must make a decision regarding the extent of risk that can be accepted for both the adjacent vehicles and it. It has to be noted that if the risk is minimal and acceptable, it must make a decisi on regarding how to mitigate the particular risk among the parties that were affected. Such ethical situations and issues must decide by the self-driven car due to the constraints during the crash (Kolk, 2016). Self-Driving Car as per Kantianism theory Arguments for the affirmative The self-driven cars will encounter the situations in which they have to decide where the correct action is legally or morally ambiguous. In such situation, the self-driven cars definitely integrate a method for determining the ethical action. It is to be noted that the experts in the industry are very cautious regarding the designing if the self-driven cars and aspects if the self-driven cars can ever eradicate all crashes (Reamer, 2013). Claims regarding the complete safety are mostly based on the assumptions regarding the abilities of the self-driven cars and the environments in which they operate. Such assumptions can be categorized into their cases: self-driven cars with imperfect systems, self-driven cars with perfect systems which are made to drive in the large traffic with the human drivers, and the self-driven cars with perfect systems which are allowed to drive with other automated vehicles (Weiss, 2014). The industry experts are very much aware of the above cases and desig n the self-driven cars accordingly. It can be reasonable to be confident that the cars driven by humans can execute judgment in a wider extent of dynamic situations and can be thus, declared to make ethical and wise decisions (Ritchie, et al., 2013). Self-driven cars are new and innovative cars made with advanced technologies and will not be programmed on breaking the law and order along with ethics in any case (Teson, 1992). It is a well-known fact that law and ethics mostly diverge and the good judgment can compel any human being it act in an illegal manner. It is fact that self-driven cars do not happen to break law in the mode of autonomous. If the self-driven cars faithfully follow regulations, then they would refuse driving in that mode if any secondary party of the vehicle is broken (Rupp, et al., 2015). Arguments for the negative On the other part of the argument, the fact that human rarely makes proper ethical decisions while driving cars is also true. The human drivers may not always make ethical decisions while driving on the road as they would generally tend to make their own way and convenience. In situations where any man is late to the workplace or any other scenarios would generally make unethical decision such as over speeding to a certain extent. This also holds true in the case of any medical emergency (Turker Altuntas, 2013). In the latter scenario the self-driven cars will not understand the emergency of the situation and keep following the rules and ethics. According to the Kantianism theory, the rightness or wrongness of any action or decision that is made by the self-driven cars will not depend on the consequences but on the fulfillment of the duty that the self-driven car is assigned to (Teson, 1992). Form such perspective; the self-driven cars will drive according to their programming witho ut giving any heed to the level of emergency of the situation (Vitell, 2015). Conclusion and Recommendation The technology of the self-driven car is still under constant development. The point of time when the advancement of technology in the both the cars and the regulation of traffic attains optimization, self-driven cars may be completely allowed to be operated on the roads. On the other hand, when many numbers of issues in the internal programming of the self-driven cars are found, these cars should be banned as it would lead to huge disasters both to life and property. The programming of the self-driven cars needs to be in sync with the ethical requirements and need collaboration between the car manufacturers and the government. Convincing people for ceding control of their loves in a self-driven car will require trust which will be materialized with advancement of time and technology. Thus, due to the fact that the self-driven cars strictly would follow the rules and laws of the traffic which would prevent any kind of accidents which mostly the ethical concern, the use of self-driven cars is agreed. References Corey, G., Corey, M.S., Corey, C. and Callanan, P., 2014.Issues and ethics in the helping professions with 2014 ACA codes. Nelson Education. Fowler, M.D., 2016. Nursing's code of ethics, social ethics, and social policy.Hastings Center Report,46(S1). Gibson, S., 2016.Mobilizing hospitality: The ethics of social relations in a mobile world. Routledge. Kolk, A., 2016. The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development.Journal of World Business,51(1), pp.23-34. Reamer, F.G., 2013.Social work values and ethics. Columbia University Press. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C.M. and Ormston, R. eds., 2013.Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage. Rupp, D.E., Wright, P.M., Aryee, S. and Luo, Y., 2015. Organizational justice, behavioral ethics, and corporate social responsibility: Finally the three shall merge. Management and Organization Review,11(1), pp.15-24. Turker, D. and Altuntas, C., 2013. Ethics of social responsibility to indirect stakeholders: a strategic perspective.International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics,8(2), pp.137-154. Teson, F.R., 1992. The Kantian theory of international law. Columbia Law Review, 92(1), pp.53-102. Vitell, S.J., 2015. A case for consumer social responsibility (CnSR): Including a selected review of consumer ethics/social responsibility research.Journal of Business Ethics,130(4), pp.767-774. Weiss, J.W., 2014.Business ethics: A stakeholder and issues management approach. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.